Registry statistics

Across all published reports. Click a year below to drill down.

These figures reflect reported thefts only โ€” bikes whose owners filed with the registry, which skews toward engaged cyclists (and likely nicer bikes). They describe reports, not all theft in Chicago. Wherever we show a percentage, we give the denominator.
12847Total reports
221Recovered (1%)
57%Have a photo

Thefts by year

2026 229
2025 389
2024 501
2023 476
2022 483
2021 473
2020 671
2019 453
2018 653
2017 851
2016 885
2015 907
2014 1030
2013 1164
2012 1097
2011 773
2010 776
2009 412
2008 321
2007 241

โš  The decline since ~2013 most likely tracks the registry's traffic and popularity over time, not Chicago bike theft itself. Read it as "reports filed per year," not a crime trend.

Seasonality โ€” thefts by month

All years combined, by incident month.

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec

By bike type

What the bike was locked to

  • Locked to bike rack. 4209 ยท 33%
  • Bike not locked. 3535 ยท 28%
  • Locked to a metal pole, pipe, or fence. 1549 ยท 12%
  • Other situation, please describe below. 1326 ยท 10%
  • Locked to street sign. 850 ยท 7%
  • Locked to a wooden pole, railing, or fence. 796 ยท 6%
  • Bike was locked only to itself. 554 ยท 4%
  • Locked to a parking meter. 24 ยท 0%
  • Bike not locked, or locked only to itself. 1 ยท 0%

Lock effectiveness โ€” how each lock was defeated

Each row reads "given this lock type, here's how those thefts happened." Row-normalized so you can compare lock types regardless of how common each is.

Lock typeCutPicked / openedAnchor failedBike + lock takenNot lockedOthern
U-lock19%3%6%59%5%8%2691
Cable lock29%1%1%64%1%3%3995
Chain24%1%5%58%6%6%387
Other4%2%22%25%11%37%2324
Lock typeCutPicked / openedAnchor failedBike + lock takenNot lockedOthern
U-lock4988116015991372162691
Cable lock114349562565561263995
Chain944202232224387
Other99455015742498562324

This is conditional on a theft and a report being filed โ€” read it as "among reported thefts of bikes on this lock, the share defeated each way," not your odds of being hit. Cable users may also park differently than U-lock users, so this mixes lock strength with behavior. "Bike + lock taken" usually means the bike was lifted off or never secured to a fixed object.

What recovered bikes had in common

Comparing the 221 recovered bikes against all reports โ€” a nudge toward registering details.

Had a photo on file76%recovered
58%all reports
Had a serial number48%recovered
46%all reports

When thefts happen โ€” hour ร— weekday

Darker = more thefts. By incident time (the ~2% with no time recorded are excluded).

Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
12a6a12p6p

How long the bike had been locked up

Of reports that recorded a duration. The "quick errand" risk is easy to underestimate.

Under 1 hour 11%
1โ€“4 hours 22%
4โ€“12 hours 23%
12โ€“24 hrs / overnight 13%
1โ€“3 days 15%
3+ days 15%

Most-stolen colors

black 1863
blue 811
red 632
white 532
silver 465
green 298
grey 423
orange 158
matte black 152
light blue 134

Counts reflect popularity as much as targeting โ€” black is the most common bike color, so being most-stolen isn't evidence dark bikes are targeted more.

How close to a landmark?

Of 10749 geocoded thefts โ€” 7444 locked, 3305 unlocked; 1759 downtown, 10221 outside. One Chicago block โ‰ˆ 1⁄8 mile (~200 m).

๐Ÿš†
19%
within 1 block of a CTA โ€˜Lโ€™ stop
42% within 2 · 61% within 3
๐Ÿš“
0%
within 1 block of a police station
2% within 2 · 6% within 3
๐Ÿซ
13%
within 1 block of a public school
46% within 2 · 73% within 3
โ˜•
61%
within 1 block of a sidewalk cafe
83% within 2 · 89% within 3
๐Ÿบ
79%
within 1 block of a bar or venue
93% within 2 · 95% within 3
๐ŸŒณ
23%
within 1 block of a park
62% within 2 · 86% within 3
๐Ÿš’
4%
within 1 block of a fire station
15% within 2 · 32% within 3
๐Ÿš†
9%
within 1 block of a CTA โ€˜Lโ€™ stop
26% within 2 · 45% within 3
๐Ÿš“
0%
within 1 block of a police station
2% within 2 · 5% within 3
๐Ÿซ
17%
within 1 block of a public school
57% within 2 · 84% within 3
โ˜•
45%
within 1 block of a sidewalk cafe
76% within 2 · 85% within 3
๐Ÿบ
65%
within 1 block of a bar or venue
89% within 2 · 92% within 3
๐ŸŒณ
25%
within 1 block of a park
66% within 2 · 87% within 3
๐Ÿš’
3%
within 1 block of a fire station
12% within 2 · 25% within 3
๐Ÿš†
36%
within 1 block of a CTA โ€˜Lโ€™ stop
68% within 2 · 88% within 3
๐Ÿš“
0%
within 1 block of a police station
0% within 2 · 0% within 3
๐Ÿซ
6%
within 1 block of a public school
19% within 2 · 42% within 3
โ˜•
86%
within 1 block of a sidewalk cafe
98% within 2 · 99% within 3
๐Ÿบ
98%
within 1 block of a bar or venue
99% within 2 · 100% within 3
๐ŸŒณ
14%
within 1 block of a park
41% within 2 · 72% within 3
๐Ÿš’
8%
within 1 block of a fire station
32% within 2 · 61% within 3
๐Ÿš†
12%
within 1 block of a CTA โ€˜Lโ€™ stop
31% within 2 · 50% within 3
๐Ÿš“
0%
within 1 block of a police station
3% within 2 · 7% within 3
๐Ÿซ
16%
within 1 block of a public school
56% within 2 · 84% within 3
โ˜•
50%
within 1 block of a sidewalk cafe
78% within 2 · 86% within 3
๐Ÿบ
70%
within 1 block of a bar or venue
90% within 2 · 93% within 3
๐ŸŒณ
26%
within 1 block of a park
68% within 2 · 89% within 3
๐Ÿš’
3%
within 1 block of a fire station
11% within 2 · 25% within 3

Thefts by ward

Geocoded reports binned into Chicago's 50 wards, ranked. Raw counts (no per-capita โ€” population data not loaded).

Ward 1 1088
Ward 42 885
Ward 32 863
Ward 47 813
Ward 44 812
Ward 43 805
Ward 34 608
Ward 46 515
Ward 35 505
Ward 27 489
Ward 2 481
Ward 26 358
Ward 36 355
Ward 48 303
Ward 40 272
Ward 49 250
Ward 5 235
Ward 4 234
Ward 33 221
Ward 25 207
Ward 28 151
Ward 11 111
Ward 39 101
Ward 45 93
Ward 3 91
Ward 30 90
Ward 50 65
Ward 20 55
Ward 31 45
Ward 12 33
Ward 41 31
Ward 38 27
Ward 24 19
Ward 19 18
Ward 29 18
Ward 13 15
Ward 14 15
Ward 16 15
Ward 23 15
Ward 22 14
Ward 15 8
Ward 37 8
Ward 21 7
Ward 6 4
Ward 8 4
Ward 7 3
Ward 9 3
Ward 17 3
Ward 10 2
Ward 18 1